雜志介紹

Topoi-an International Review Of Philosophy雜志介紹

《Topoi-an International Review Of Philosophy》是一本以English為主的未開放獲取國際優(yōu)秀期刊，中文名稱托波伊國際哲學評論，本刊主要出版、報道哲學-PHILOSOPHY領域的研究動態(tài)以及在該領域取得的各方面的經(jīng)驗和科研成果，介紹該領域有關本專業(yè)的最新進展，探討行業(yè)發(fā)展的思路和方法，以促進學術信息交流，提高行業(yè)發(fā)展。該刊已被國際權威數(shù)據(jù)庫SCIE收錄，為該領域相關學科的發(fā)展起到了良好的推動作用，也得到了本專業(yè)人員的廣泛認可。該刊最新影響因子為1.3，最新CiteScore 指數(shù)為2.8。

本刊近期中國學者發(fā)表的論文主要有：

• Sensitivity, Safety, and Brains in Vats

  Author: Zhao, Haicheng

• A Scheme and Critical Questions for the argumentum ad baculum

  Author: Yu, Shiyang; Zenker, Frank

英文介紹

Topoi-an International Review Of Philosophy雜志英文介紹

Topoi's main assumption is that philosophy is a lively, provocative, delightful activity, which constantly challenges our received views, relentlessly questions our inherited habits, painstakingly elaborates on how things could be different, in other stories, in counterfactual situations, in alternative possible worlds. Whatever its ideology, whether with the intent of uncovering a truer structure of reality or of soothing our anxiety, of exposing myths or of following them through, the outcome of philosophical activity is always the destabilizing, unsettling generation of doubts, of objections, of criticisms. It follows that this activity is intrinsically a 'dialogue', that philosophy is first and foremost philosophical discussion, that it requires bringing out conflicting points of view, paying careful, sympathetic attention to their structure, and using this dialectic to articulate one's approach, to make it richer, more thoughtful, more open to variation and play. And it follows that the spirit which one brings to this activity must be one of tolerance, of always suspecting one's own blindness and consequently looking with unbiased eye in every corner, without fearing to pass a (fallible) judgment on what is there but also without failing to show interest and respect. Topoi's structure is a direct expression of this view. To maximize discussion, we devote most or all of this issue to a single topic. And, since discussion is only interesting when it is conducted seriously and responsibly, we usually request the collaboration of a guest-editor, an expert who will identify contributors and interact with them in a constructive way. Because we do not feel tied to any definite philosophical theme (or set of them), we choose the topic with absolute freedom, looking for what is blossoming and thriving, occasionally betting on what might - partly through our attention - 'begin' to blossom and thrive. And because we do not want our structur e to become our own straightjacket, we are open to contributions not fitting the 'topos', and do not rule out in principle the possibility of topic-less issues.