導(dǎo)語：畢業(yè)論文格式一文來源于網(wǎng)友上傳，不代表本站觀點(diǎn)，若需要原創(chuàng)文章可咨詢客服老師，歡迎參考。

2004年月“目錄”樣式ReflectiononChomsky’sIdealizationofLanguageI.IntroductionII.DemonstrationA.Languageasaconcretesystemofsigns,hasitsownsignificanceinthecontextofsociety.1.Languageisasystem.2.Theconventionalizationoflanguage.B.Languageasasocialinstitution,municativefunctionoflanguage.2.Languageevolveshandinhandwiththesociety.a.Influencesfromthesocietyuponlanguage.1)Macrolinguisticperceptive2)Microlinguisticperceptiveb.Influencesfromlanguageuponsociety1)Interactionbetweenlanguageandsociety2)SocialfactorsandlinguisticresearchIII.Conclusion“英、中文摘要、關(guān)鍵詞”樣式AbstractThispaperbeginswithabriefintroductiontoChomsky’smethodologyofidealizationinlinguisticresearch.AlthoughtheidealizationinphysicalresearchfromwhichChomsky’sidealizationdeprivescanstillkeepnaturallaws’validity,theauthorpointsoutChomsky’sidealizationisnotaccessible.Thekeypointliesintheexclusionofsocialfactorsinhisresearch.ThentheauthordemonstratesthereasonwhyChomsky’sexclusionofsocialfactorsisnotaccessiblefromtwoaspects:(1)Languageisaconcretesystemofsigns.(2)Languageisasocialinstitution.Onlyinthecontextofsocietyarethesefeaturessignificantandintegrate,canlanguagebearitsformandforwarditsdevelopmentandkeepuptheinteractionwiththesociety.Thereforeinsteadof“beingidealized”outoflinguisticresearch,socialfactorsshouldberegardedasthebaseoftheresearch.Otherwisetheobjectoftheresearchwillbetotallychangedandtheresearchitselfwillbemisguided.Asforwhatfactorscanbetemporarilyidealizedwithoutchanginglanguage’sfundamentalfeatures?Thisisaquestionworthourfurtherstudyinthefuture.摘要：本文從Chomsky在語言學(xué)研究過程中所采用的理想化模式入手，認(rèn)為Chomsky為了使研究變得簡(jiǎn)單，便將與語言關(guān)系緊密的社會(huì)因素摒除在研究范圍之外，這是一種不可取的理想模式。接下來本文從兩個(gè)主要方面闡述了理想化模式不可取的原因：一是語言作為一種符號(hào)系統(tǒng)，只有在社會(huì)的環(huán)境下才能具有完整的意義。二是語言作為一種社會(huì)結(jié)構(gòu)，無論是它的產(chǎn)生還是發(fā)展過程，都在不斷地和社會(huì)發(fā)生著相互作用。故而只要是研究語言學(xué)，我們就不能將社會(huì)因素“理想化”。至于什么因素可以暫時(shí)不予考慮，這仍有待進(jìn)一步的研究。關(guān)鍵詞：理想化，符號(hào)系統(tǒng)，社會(huì)結(jié)構(gòu)，語言與社會(huì)的相互作用